1. IHP, Frankfurt (Oder), Germany
2. Department of Electrical Engineering, UFMG - Belo Horizonte-MG, Brazil
3. University of Applied Sciences Wildau, Germany
| Time | Program |
|---|---|
| Opening Session | |
| 10:00 – 10:20 | Welcome & Registration |
| 10:20 – 10:30 | Opening Remarks (Prof. Sung‑Jae Cho, Ewha Womans University) |
| Session 1 | Chair: Prof. Sung‑Jae Cho | |
| 10:30 – 11:15 | Semiconductor Devices for the New Computing Era Prof. Woo‑Young Choi, Seoul National University |
| 11:15 – 12:00 | Development Strategy for AI‑Oriented NAND Solutions Prof. Ki‑Hwan Song, Yonsei University |
| 12:00 – 13:30 | Lunch |
| Session 2 | Chair: Prof. Myung‑Gon Kang | |
| 13:30 – 14:15 | Trends and Outlook of eNVM Technology Visiting Prof. Yong‑Gyu Lee, Seoul National University |
| 14:15 – 15:00 | Memcapacitor Technology for Charge‑Domain PIM Implementation Prof. Tae‑Hyun Kim, Seoul National University of Science and Technology |
| 15:00 – 15:10 | Coffee Break |
| Session 3 | Chair: Prof. Il‑Hwan Cho | |
| 15:10 – 15:55 |
Atomically Thin 2D Semiconductor Electronics toward Beyond‑CMOS Technology Prof. Chul‑Ho Lee, Seoul National University |
| 15:55 – 16:40 |
Orders‑of‑Magnitude Faster TCAD Device Simulation of GAA MOSFETs without Additional Computational Training Cost Prof. Sung‑Min Hong, GIST |
| 16:40 – 17:00 | Closing Ceremony | Prof. Il‑Hwan Cho, Myongji University |
Now through January 18, 2024, the TCAD app is free for download. After this, you will be entitled to any free future updates [read more...]
Fig: Equivalent capacitance network and illustrative C-V curve showing NMOS and NC curves. CNC > CINV results in non-hysteretic switching, but low voltage gain in the off-state due to CNC >> COV. Setting CNC to CNC2, which is matched more closely to COV, results in very low SS, but also hysteretic switching as CNC2 < CINV.
Acknowledgment: The authors would like to thank Paul Solomon and Prof. Sayeef Salahuddin for insightful discussions, as well as Synopsys for technical support.
[1] N. Chatterjee, J. Ortega, I. Meric, P. Xiao and I. Tsameret, "Machine Learning On Transistor Aging Data: Test Time Reduction and Modeling for Novel Devices," 2021 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS), 2021, pp. 1-9, doi: 10.1109/IRPS46558.2021.9405188.
Abstract: Accurately modeling the I-V characteristics and current degradation for transistors is central to predicting circuit end-of-life behavior. In this work, we propose a machine learning model to accurately model current degradation at various stress conditions and extend that to make nominal use-bias predictions. The model can be extended to track and predict any parametric change. We show an excellent agreement of the model with experimental results. Furthermore, we use a deep neural network to model the I-V characteristics of aged transistors over a wide drain and gate playback bias range and show an excellent agreement with experimental results. We show that the model is reliably able to interpolate and extrapolate demonstrating that it learns the underlying functional form of the data.
URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=9405188&isnumber=9405088
[2] P. B. Vyas et al., "Reliability-Conscious MOSFET Compact Modeling with Focus on the Defect-Screening Effect of Hot-Carrier Injection," 2021 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS), 2021, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/IRPS46558.2021.9405197.
Abstract: Accurate prediction of device aging plays a vital role in the circuit design of advanced-node CMOS technologies. In particular, hot-carrier induced aging is so complicated that its modeling is often significantly simplified, with focus limited to digital circuits. We present here a novel reliability-aware compact modeling method that can accurately capture the full post-stress I-V characteristics of the MOSFET, taking into account the impact of drain depletion region on induced defects.
URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=9405197&isnumber=9405088
[3] Z. Wu et al., "Physics-based device aging modelling framework for accurate circuit reliability assessment," 2021 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS), 2021, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1109/IRPS46558.2021.9405106.
Abstract: An analytical device aging modelling framework, ranging from microscopic degradation physics up to the aged I-V characteristics, is demonstrated. We first expand our reliability oriented I-V compact model, now including temperature and body-bias effects; second, we propose an analytical solution for channel carrier profiling which-compared to our previous work-circumvents the need of TCAD aid; third, through Poisson's equation, we convert the extracted carrier density profile into channel lateral and oxide electric fields; fourth, we represent the device as an equivalent ballistic MOSFETs chain to enable channel “slicing” and propagate local degradation into the aged I-V characteristics, without requiring computationally-intensive self-consistent calculations. The local degradation in each channel “slice” is calculated with physics-based reliability models (2-state NMP, SVE/MVE). The demonstrated aging modelling framework is verified against TCAD and validated across a broad range of VG/VD/T stress conditions in a scaled finFET technology.
URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=9405106&isnumber=9405088
[1] M. Müller, P. Dollfus and M. Schröter, "1-D Drift-Diffusion Simulation of Two-Valley Semiconductors and Devices," in IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1221-1227, March 2021, doi: 10.1109/TED.2021.3051552.
Abstract: A two-valley formulation of 1-D drift-diffusion transport is presented that takes the coupling between the valleys into account via a new approximation for the nonlocal electric field. The proposed formulation is suitable for the simulation of III–V heterojunction bipolar transistors as opposed to formulations that employ the single electron gas approximation with a modified velocity-field model, which also causes convergence problems. Based on Boltzmann transport equation simulations, model parameters of the proposed two-valley formulation are given for GaAs, InP, InAs, and GaSb at room temperature. Applications of the new formulation are also demonstrated.
Code/Dataset: This article contains datasets made available via IEEE DataPort, a repository of datasets intended to facilitate analysis and enable reproducible research. Click the dataset name below to access it on the IEEE DataPort website.
[2] A. Rawat et al., "Experimental Validation of Process-Induced Variability Aware SPICE Simulation Platform for Sub-20 nm FinFET Technologies," in IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 976-980, March 2021, doi: 10.1109/TED.2021.3053185.


• TCAD device models for• Process simulation
• new materials (2D materials, oxides, organic semiconductors, oxide semiconductors,
nanowire devices etc.)
• new device types (magnetic devices, memristors, spintronics, qubits, sensors etc.)
• physical effects (ferroelectric dielectrics, thermal transport at nanoscale, atomistic
simulation etc.)
• simulation conditions that push the limits of standard TCAD: ballistic transport, THz
frequencies, cryogenic conditions, device degradation, electromagnetic and plasma
waves in active devices, transient simulations, noise and fluctuations, microscopic
simulation of large power devices
• Atomistic process simulation to generate structures for atomistic device simulations• New methods for the TCAD tool chain
(including both interconnects and transistors)
• Gate stack modeling including dipole diffusion
• Stress simulation for nanosheet and forksheet devices and stress simulations
including layout effects
• Topological simulation
• Equipment simulation
• Self-consistent integration of simulation models into the hierarchy
• Device-circuit interaction
• Multi-physics and multi-scale integration
• Efficient use of the data produced along the chain
• Workflow improvements
• Methods that improve the turn-around-time for TCAD simulations
1. Prof. Fabrizio Bonani, Politecnico di Torino, Italy
2. Dr. Stephen Cea, Intel Corp., USA
3. Prof. Elena Gnani, University of Bologna, Italy
4. Prof. Sung-Min Hong, GIST, Republic of Korea
5. Dr. Seonghoon Jin, Samsung, USA
6. Prof. Christoph Jungemann, RWTH Aachen, Germany
7. Prof. Xiaoyan Liu, Peking University, China
8. Dr. Victor Moroz, Synopsys, USA
9. Dr. Anne Verhulst, imec, Belgium